Suchen Casino       deutsch   français   italiano   english  
09.02.2010    04:15
Home       Über uns       Kontakt        Team        Presse        Newsletter       Hier werben          
Name:
Ort:
Ihre Info-Plattform / Index
> Deutschland
> Oesterreich
> Schweiz
> Las Vegas
Welt-Suche
Suche nach Sparten
News und Presse
Tournaments / Events
Casino-Trends
Swisspoker Team-Cup ‘08
Tages-Horoskop
Live-Jackpots
CasinoSchule
CasinoRent
Facts & Figures
Voting
Wettbewerb
Nützliche Links
Prämienberechnung KK
Kalender 2010
Spielautomaten
Gesetze / Verband
Spielanleitungen
Fotogalerie & Livecams
Interviews
Impressum
AGB - Disclaimer
Casinos en
Casinos it
Casinos fr
Seite anmelden
Login - Eintrag ändern
Casinoberufe
Offene Stellen
Das Suchportal
Produktesuche
Werbebooster.ch - einfach werben!
  
  News und Insider-Infos  
   
 
  SwissPoker FREEROLL Tournament     Jetzt Playerprofil erfassen!
 
 
  News-Ticker
Link auf Firmenportrait -  Link auf Pressemappe -  Seite drucken
 
 Poker-Strategy: Value-Betting the River (21.10.2008)
Titel
Poker-Strategy: Value-Betting the River

Autor/Erfasser
externe Quelle

Firmenportrait
Swiss Poker

System powered by
HELP.ch

BY: ED MILLER on Cardplayer.com
The river really separates the pros from the amateurs. I don't mean that pros tremble in 
fear of the river card while amateurs gleefully plan their latest bad beat. Quite the 
opposite, as the river is probably the betting round where pro players generate the 
greatest edge over their amateur adversaries.

Amateur players tend not to bet enough hands for value on the river, and that error 
cripples them in two ways. First, they don't win big enough pots with their good hands. 
The river bet is often the biggest bet of the hand, and when amateur players check down 
hands they should be betting, they win medium pots when they should be winning huge pots.

Second, amateurs can't bluff as effectively when they don't value-bet to balance their 
strategy. If I know a player likes to check down good hands like top pair or a medium-
sized two pair, I use that knowledge against him when he does bet. I know that his range 
is very polarized - either he has a real monster or he's bluffing. He doesn't have 
anything in the middle because he checks those hands down. This knowledge presents me 
with some slam-dunk opportunities to snap off bluffs. If I know that in a certain 
situation, someone would bet only a full house or nothing, when he bets, he'll usually 
be bluffing. After all, it's a lot easier to have nothing than it is to have a boat.

Betting From Out of Position

Many players get very timid on the river. If they have a hand like a decent pair, 
they'll check and just hope the hand gets checked down. Imagine if you were a boxer and 
your strategy for the last few rounds was just to cower in the corner and hope you 
didn't get punched. You'd get picked apart. You might make it through some fights, but 
in others, your opponent would seize the opportunity, find the right punch, and knock 
you out.

Checking the river too often also will get you picked apart. Sometimes your opponent 
will check and you'll get to see a showdown. You might even win some pots. But other 
times, your opponent will bet, and the bet will be on his terms, to his advantage. 
You'll get bluffed off the best hand. Or, you'll pay off better hands. Over time, this 
passive strategy gives your opponents too much leeway, and you'll pay for it.

You have to keep punching on the river. Sometimes you'll get knocked out anyway, but 
sometimes you'll land a good punch yourself. An active strategy makes you a much tougher 
target.

Making Blocking Bets

Making blocking bets is one way that you can stay more active when out of position. 
Blocking bets are small bets, usually around a quarter to half the size of the pot. If 
the pot on the river is $100, for instance, you might bet out for $30 or $35. Blocking 
bets do two things for you: They help you get paid by worse hands, and they set the 
price of a showdown.
Let's say you have A-9 on a J-9-5-4-8 board and check the river. Your opponent might 
check behind with hands weaker than yours and bet $70 with better hands and some bluffs, 
so you feel compelled to call. This strategy wins you nothing when you're ahead and 
loses you a good bit when you're behind.

Now let's say you bet out for $35. Your opponent calls with both weaker and stronger 
hands. You're winning something from worse hands and not losing as much to the better 
hands. By "setting the price" of a showdown at $35, you take away much of your 
opponent's positional advantage.

Blocking bets are an effective tool, but they do have some downsides. If you make 
blocking bets only when you want to see a cheap showdown, you give good players too much 
information about your hand, and they can use it against you. Also, if your hand is 
really fairly hopeless, sometimes just checking and folding is better than trying a 
blocking bet.

Betting Scare Cards

Adding blocking bets to your strategy isn't the only way you can be more active when out 
of position. You also should bet some scare cards.

Let's say you flop a set and bet the flop and turn. Your opponent calls both streets. 
The pot is $400, and you and your opponent both have $200 left in your stacks. The river 
brings the third heart. You know that your opponent easily could have been drawing to 
the flush. Shove all in anyway.

The short explanation is that if you check, you let your opponent off the hook with top 
pair or two pair, but you usually end up paying off the flush anyway. Whereas, if you 
shove all in yourself, you pay off the flush, but get paid off by the weaker hands. 
Checking has you winning a little or losing a lot. Shoving has you winning a lot or 
losing a lot. You're better off playing the latter strategy.

The stack sizes were key in this example. The pot was $400 and there was only $200 left 
in your stack, so you'd likely be committed with a set no matter what. If you had $1,000 
left, the situation would be considerably trickier, and the best play might depend on 
your history with your opponent.

Recently, I played a hand in which I shoved all in on a scary river card. I had opened 
for $10 in an online $1-$2 game with A-Q from three off the button. A new player who had 
posted in the cutoff called, as did the big blind. The flop came A-9-3 with two 
diamonds. I bet $25, and the player in the cutoff called.

The turn was an offsuit ace. I bet $70, and the cutoff called. The pot was $221 going to 
the river, and we each had $95 left.
The river was the 2d, completing the possible flush. I shoved for $95 and got called. My 
opponent had 9-5, and I won a big pot from my opponent who had flopped middle pair and 
went with it.

Obviously, some percentage of the time I could expect my opponent to have the flush. But 
if I had checked the river, I would have paid off an all in bet. So, I was likely going 
to lose the maximum to a flush no matter what I did. By shoving all in, I won an extra 
$95 from a hand that almost certainly would have taken a free showdown if I had offered 
it. That's the benefit of betting aggressively for value. 

Ed is a featured coach at StoxPoker.com. Also check out his online poker advice column, 
NotedPokerAuthority.com. He has authored four books on poker, most recently, 
Professional No-Limit Hold'em: Volume 1.
Information von Richard Honegger
 
 
 
  
News
SECO: Die Lage auf dem Arbeitsmarkt im Januar 2010
SECO - Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft, 08.02.2010

Energiedienst Holding mit NaturEnergie auf gutem Weg
Energiedienst AG, 08.02.2010

WEKO eröffnet Untersuchung gegen Hallenstadion und Ticketcorner
WEKO - Wettbewerbskommission, 08.02.2010

weitere News
 
23:35
Die Ideenfabrik China ist USA auf den Fersen >>>

21:10
Michael Jacksons Arzt wegen fahrlässiger Tötung angeklagt >>>

18:10
Schwergewichte heben SMI ins Plus >>>

Wettbewerbe

Marktplatz






Video-Anzeige 
Video in gross anzeigen
Anzeigen
Kooperationen
Aktuellenews.ch

Eventkalender.ch


 
 
© HELP Searchengines AG
Garantiert seriöse Verzeichnisse
Tel. 0848 CASINOS