Titel
Poker Strategy 83: Laying Down Big Hands
Autor/Erfasser
externe Quelle
Firmenportrait
Swiss Poker
System powered by
HELP.ch
|
BY: TODD BRUNSON, cardplayer.com
The Doyle Brunson Classic
As I mentioned in my last column, I placed 15th in the Doyle Brunson Classic, a WPT
event held at Bellagio. Not only would it have been great to win my father's tournament,
but the first prize was $2.5 million! This is one of the biggest tournaments in the
world outside the World Series of Poker. I had to settle for a little less than $100,000
as a consolation prize, unfortunately.
This was a great tourney. Jack McClelland started us with 30,000 in chips without
starting the limits at 1,000-2,000 right off the bat. We also had 90-minute levels, so
there was a lot of play. This was no all-in donkeyfest, which many formerly great events
have become.
While I usually advocate an aggressive gambling style in tournaments, this type of
tournament requires a more laid-back, selective style. Now, I'm not saying that you
should play passively; I'm just saying that you have more time to pick your spots, so
you should take it. I laid down more hands in this tournament than I have in the past
year, literally.
That's what this column is about, laying down big hands. It's tough to know when to
hold 'em and when to fold 'em, especially in a slow-paced tourney like this one.
I usually believe that when faced with a decision in a tournament, you're always better
off erring on the play side (calling or raising) as opposed to the laydown side. You
normally don't have much time, and may never see another big hand again before the antes
eat you up.
This is what I hate about contemporary tournament poker. Any idiot who is aggressive
enough can win a tournament with minimal poker-playing skill. Ever notice that many of
these tournament champs get eaten alive in the side (real) games? Hopefully, tournaments
such as this will set the bar; slow down the tournaments and let us play real poker,
instead of just moving all in.
Anyway, now that I got that off my chest, let's get back to my laydowns and why I made
them. To start, let's qualify a big laydown. I think that anytime you lay down a big
pair, that's obviously a big laydown. I consider a big pair to be aces, kings, and
queens. Not only do I not consider jacks a big pair, I think queens are pushing it.
Middle pairs can be a big laydown late in the tournament, especially when you have a lot
of money already invested in the pot. In the early and middle stages of a tournament, I
believe you should be trying to see flops cheaply with these hands and not gambling.
Therefore, I don't think throwing them away is usually any big deal.
A-K (preflop) is a whole story unto itself. If I ever manage to get my book out, I'm
going to devote an entire chapter to this hand. Late in a tournament, when the blinds
are high, I think this hand can almost never be correctly laid down; you must play it.
In the middle stages, it's still a big hand, but it's possible to get away from it if
you have enough chips. Early on, it's nowhere near the hand it will be later, and can
easily be mucked.
Let's start my laydowns with this: I mucked A-K offsuit three times in the early limits.
All three times, it was raised and reraised in front of me. Once, it was even a player I
consider to be a goofball who made the second raise. I could have gambled here, but with
no antes and the blinds relatively small, I just didn't see the need. I figured I'd
either miss the flop or hit an ace or a king, in which case I'd likely get no action
unless I was beat (or they were in with a good draw to beat me). It's just not worth it
at this point, in my opinion.
Toward the middle of the first day, with the blinds at 300-600, I raised to 1,800 with A-
K offsuit. I was reraised to 5,000 from the big blind and I called. The flop came K-Q-6
rainbow. My opponent bet out 5,000, a little less than half the pot.
I had about 45,000 and he had me covered, so this was a pretty small bet. Was he weak or
trying to suck me in? I could raise here and try to find out where I was, but sometimes
a call is scarier than a raise, so that's what I did.
The turn card was a blank and he fired out again, this time 15,000. This was starting to
get serious. If I stick in close to 40 percent of my chips here with a made hand, I'm
committed. I'm either going to raise here and find out, or possibly just call, in which
case I'm calling the river no matter what.
This is a very close call. It's hard to lay down A-K after flopping a pair. On the other
hand, he did reraise me preflop, so a big pair was likely. However, most people consider
tens and higher big pairs, so he may have jacks or tens and just be continuing through
with his betting. In this case, I could beat tens and jacks, while losing to aces,
queens, and the off chance that he had the two case kings.
A-K was another possibility. And if we throw A-Q in the mix, I beat most combinations.
Now, if we throw in the random reraise with, say, 6-5 suited, I beat the vast majority
of hands.
If the pressure was on, I probably would have had to call this hand. But keep in mind
what I discussed earlier; this was a slow-paced tourney and I'd still have 40,000 if I
mucked this hand. I was sure that I could find a better spot, so I released my A-K and
he later told me that he had two aces.
I know that he could have been lying, but I tend to believe him. You see, I did have a
little more info to help me with this analysis. Earlier, he had made a big raise and was
shaking uncontrollably. When he was called, he had the nut straight. Against me, when I
stalled a long time, he was breathing so hard that I was afraid he might have a heart
attack.
Later, he tried a big bluff in which he fired on all three streets. He was as cool as a
cucumber; go figure. Watching my opponents paid off in spades here. Remember, if you're
willing to play in a big event like this, you'd better be willing to pay more than
$15,000, and you'd better be willing to pay attention! We'll get to more laydowns in my
next column
Todd: Ah, Kd
Board: Kc, Qs, 6h, 4d
Information von Richard Honegger
|