Branchenportale
 
   Suchen Casino       deutsch   français   italiano   english  
09.02.2010    04:11
Home       Über uns       Kontakt        Team        Presse        Newsletter       Hier werben          
Name:
Ort:
Ihre Info-Plattform / Index
> Deutschland
> Oesterreich
> Schweiz
> Las Vegas
Welt-Suche
Suche nach Sparten
News und Presse
Tournaments / Events
Casino-Trends
Swisspoker Team-Cup ‘08
Tages-Horoskop
Live-Jackpots
CasinoSchule
CasinoRent
Facts & Figures
Voting
Wettbewerb
Nützliche Links
Prämienberechnung KK
Kalender 2010
Spielautomaten
Gesetze / Verband
Spielanleitungen
Fotogalerie & Livecams
Interviews
Impressum
AGB - Disclaimer
Casinos en
Casinos it
Casinos fr
Seite anmelden
Login - Eintrag ändern
Casinoberufe
Offene Stellen
Das Suchportal
Produktesuche
Krankenkassen-Prämie 2010
PLZ:
Alter:
  
  News und Insider-Infos  
   
 
  SwissPoker FREEROLL Tournament     Jetzt Playerprofil erfassen!
 
  Help.ch! Das Suchportal ®
  News-Ticker
Link auf Firmenportrait -  Link auf Pressemappe -  Seite drucken
 
 Poker Strategy 83: Laying Down Big Hands (30.03.2008)
Titel
Poker Strategy 83: Laying Down Big Hands

Autor/Erfasser
externe Quelle

Firmenportrait
Swiss Poker

System powered by
HELP.ch

BY: TODD BRUNSON, cardplayer.com 

The Doyle Brunson Classic
As I mentioned in my last column, I placed 15th in the Doyle Brunson Classic, a WPT 
event held at Bellagio. Not only would it have been great to win my father's tournament, 
but the first prize was $2.5 million! This is one of the biggest tournaments in the 
world outside the World Series of Poker. I had to settle for a little less than $100,000 
as a consolation prize, unfortunately.

This was a great tourney. Jack McClelland started us with 30,000 in chips without 
starting the limits at 1,000-2,000 right off the bat. We also had 90-minute levels, so 
there was a lot of play. This was no all-in donkeyfest, which many formerly great events 
have become.

While I usually advocate an aggressive gambling style in tournaments, this type of 
tournament requires a more laid-back, selective style. Now, I'm not saying that you 
should play passively; I'm just saying that you have more time to pick your spots, so 
you should take it. I laid down more hands in this tournament than I have in the past 
year, literally.

That's what this column is about, laying down big hands. It's tough to know when to 
hold 'em and when to fold 'em, especially in a slow-paced tourney like this one.

I usually believe that when faced with a decision in a tournament, you're always better 
off erring on the play side (calling or raising) as opposed to the laydown side. You 
normally don't have much time, and may never see another big hand again before the antes 
eat you up.

This is what I hate about contemporary tournament poker. Any idiot who is aggressive 
enough can win a tournament with minimal poker-playing skill. Ever notice that many of 
these tournament champs get eaten alive in the side (real) games? Hopefully, tournaments 
such as this will set the bar; slow down the tournaments and let us play real poker, 
instead of just moving all in.

Anyway, now that I got that off my chest, let's get back to my laydowns and why I made 
them. To start, let's qualify a big laydown. I think that anytime you lay down a big 
pair, that's obviously a big laydown. I consider a big pair to be aces, kings, and 
queens. Not only do I not consider jacks a big pair, I think queens are pushing it.

Middle pairs can be a big laydown late in the tournament, especially when you have a lot 
of money already invested in the pot. In the early and middle stages of a tournament, I 
believe you should be trying to see flops cheaply with these hands and not gambling. 
Therefore, I don't think throwing them away is usually any big deal.

A-K (preflop) is a whole story unto itself. If I ever manage to get my book out, I'm 
going to devote an entire chapter to this hand. Late in a tournament, when the blinds 
are high, I think this hand can almost never be correctly laid down; you must play it. 
In the middle stages, it's still a big hand, but it's possible to get away from it if 
you have enough chips. Early on, it's nowhere near the hand it will be later, and can 
easily be mucked.

Let's start my laydowns with this: I mucked A-K offsuit three times in the early limits. 
All three times, it was raised and reraised in front of me. Once, it was even a player I 
consider to be a goofball who made the second raise. I could have gambled here, but with 
no antes and the blinds relatively small, I just didn't see the need. I figured I'd 
either miss the flop or hit an ace or a king, in which case I'd likely get no action 
unless I was beat (or they were in with a good draw to beat me). It's just not worth it 
at this point, in my opinion.

Toward the middle of the first day, with the blinds at 300-600, I raised to 1,800 with A-
K offsuit. I was reraised to 5,000 from the big blind and I called. The flop came K-Q-6 
rainbow. My opponent bet out 5,000, a little less than half the pot.

I had about 45,000 and he had me covered, so this was a pretty small bet. Was he weak or 
trying to suck me in? I could raise here and try to find out where I was, but sometimes 
a call is scarier than a raise, so that's what I did.

The turn card was a blank and he fired out again, this time 15,000. This was starting to 
get serious. If I stick in close to 40 percent of my chips here with a made hand, I'm 
committed. I'm either going to raise here and find out, or possibly just call, in which 
case I'm calling the river no matter what.

This is a very close call. It's hard to lay down A-K after flopping a pair. On the other 
hand, he did reraise me preflop, so a big pair was likely. However, most people consider 
tens and higher big pairs, so he may have jacks or tens and just be continuing through 
with his betting. In this case, I could beat tens and jacks, while losing to aces, 
queens, and the off chance that he had the two case kings.

A-K was another possibility. And if we throw A-Q in the mix, I beat most combinations. 
Now, if we throw in the random reraise with, say, 6-5 suited, I beat the vast majority 
of hands.

If the pressure was on, I probably would have had to call this hand. But keep in mind 
what I discussed earlier; this was a slow-paced tourney and I'd still have 40,000 if I 
mucked this hand. I was sure that I could find a better spot, so I released my A-K and 
he later told me that he had two aces.

I know that he could have been lying, but I tend to believe him. You see, I did have a 
little more info to help me with this analysis. Earlier, he had made a big raise and was 
shaking uncontrollably. When he was called, he had the nut straight. Against me, when I 
stalled a long time, he was breathing so hard that I was afraid he might have a heart 
attack.

Later, he tried a big bluff in which he fired on all three streets. He was as cool as a 
cucumber; go figure. Watching my opponents paid off in spades here. Remember, if you're 
willing to play in a big event like this, you'd better be willing to pay more than 
$15,000, and you'd better be willing to pay attention! We'll get to more laydowns in my 
next column

Todd: Ah, Kd
Board: Kc, Qs, 6h, 4d
Information von Richard Honegger
 
 
 
  
News
SECO: Die Lage auf dem Arbeitsmarkt im Januar 2010
SECO - Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft, 08.02.2010

Energiedienst Holding mit NaturEnergie auf gutem Weg
Energiedienst AG, 08.02.2010

WEKO eröffnet Untersuchung gegen Hallenstadion und Ticketcorner
WEKO - Wettbewerbskommission, 08.02.2010

weitere News
 
23:35
Die Ideenfabrik China ist USA auf den Fersen >>>

21:10
Michael Jacksons Arzt wegen fahrlässiger Tötung angeklagt >>>

18:10
Schwergewichte heben SMI ins Plus >>>

Wettbewerbe

Marktplatz






Video-Anzeige 
Video in gross anzeigen
Anzeigen
Kooperationen
Aktuellenews.ch

Eventkalender.ch


 
 
© HELP Searchengines AG
Garantiert seriöse Verzeichnisse
Tel. 0848 CASINOS